I am glad compliance officers and their lawyers are getting more respect, and this suggests how significant the impact the regulatory reforms of the last few years has been. Firms are willing to shell out a lot more for compliance now than they would just a few years ago. Link: After Scandals, New Legal Stars Rise on Wall St. - New York Times.
Just as corporate raiders represented the Wall Street of the 1980's (think of Gordon Gekko) and mutual fund managers were the icons of the 90's (Jeffrey N. Vinik, who ran the Fidelity Magellan fund, was a minor celebrity), the lawyers who keep companies in compliance with increasingly tough regulatory laws have become a new prototype of the financial district.
They may lack the flash and glamour of earlier models, but this is the compliance lawyer's moment in the sun.
***
Nonetheless, new regulations and several years of aggressive tactics against Wall Street firms by the New York State attorney general, Eliot Spitzer, have created a hot commodity out of a legal specialty that five years ago was regarded as the bottom of the food chain.
"These are the people who can blow you up if you have a compliance failure or a rogue trader," said Frank Fernandez, chief economist at the Securities Industry Association.
And Maureen S. Brundage, head of the securities section in the New York office of the law firm of White & Case, noted: "The profile of the compliance lawyer has changed. It used to be generally a dead-end job with no future."
Reading this does leave one mildly sour aftertaste however. Compliance in the financial industry is certainly very necessary and important, but the primary goal of financial institutions should be to provide useful products and services, and compliance is a means to achieve that goal, not a goal in and of itself. One hopes that this does not pressage the rise of a manadarin class that will constitute a permanent regulatory/compliance complex.